Vol. 6. ACC Secretariat c/o OAG :- Ombudsman-Kisumu PDF-Attachment back to square-A ACC c/o OAG: GoK sadist, animist-witch, GLBTQ-Occultist ex-President Uhuru's and co. political-legal abuse endemic, systemic-and-systematic corruption continued sanctioned endless-persecution ( for purposes of shielding his criminal co-conspirators, accomplices and bosom-buddies from persecution ) to embezzle me my now 10yrs 2-months Kihara-Construction accident evidence-destruction / spoilation continuous-violations-of-the-law series-of-crimes 10m+ litigation damages case as Ombudsman-Kisumu finally replied on 25th July 2022 on a PDF-letter addressed way back on 28th April 2022 even before the Ombudsman-Nairobi contacted me on 23rd May 2022. I pray the divine-intervention of civil-society-groups / concerned authorities to fasttrack arrest-and-prosecution of the impunity for purposes of expediting payment of my risked damages as I wane in virility at 44yrs of imposed pauperism unable to date or marry. SOS.

                                                            REPUBLIC OF KENYA 

                                                 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL 

                                                                              & 

                                                         DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

                               YOUR REF: TBA                                                     Date: 5/9/2022 

                               OUR REF: CC/PE/AUG/22/36 (6833) ERICK MANGO OTIENO   

                           On issue no.1. of my complaint lodged via Help Form dated 18/8/2022, complaining against two different advocates as mentioned herein above requesting that I lodge two separate complaints in that regard:  I wish to submit that being an indigent as numerously presented in our previous correspondences my efforts to raise the requisite cash for printing at ( 10/- x 7 pages )x2=140/- ; scanning at ( 30/- x 7 )x2=420/- and processing to email to you at a total of between ( 660/- and 1000/- ) have been hampered cause of the vast vested interests regarding the pending due process facing the two culprit advocates and their co-conspirators including the adversely mentioned immediate ex-President Uhuru and former Premier Raila... the reason it's taken me all this while up to close to the 21-days deadline to draft this reply and tell you of the status-quo while praying as submitted below citing :-

{ -(a.):-Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution that establishes that administration of justice provides that:- “In exercising judicial authority, the courts and tribunals shall be guided by the following principles…justice shall be administered without undue regard to procedural technicalities.” and as such Courts are guided and cautioned not to pay undue regard to procedural technicalities, since justice delayed is justice denied besides the fact that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done in the public eye and therefore my aggravated cases in my broad lawsuit adding to backlog statistics with IPOA, ODPP and the CAJ / OJO due to political-legal abuses by the executive out of vested interests ( like has been noted with the several quashed Uhuru's illegal, unlawful Executive-Orders ) since Uhuru-and-Raila are adversely mentioned as chief-defendants needs to be determined as quickly as possible to deter execution of their death-threats and criminal-conspiracies. In addition, matters before Court require to be disposed of without delay so as to avoid congestion of the Court with several matters resulting in an enormous case backlog when matters can be disposed off; besides the Mutunga Rules in

-(b.):-The practice and procedure generally in regard to institution and prosecution of Constitutional matters is clearly guided by the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules 2013, otherwise referred to as (Mutunga Rules); and as such as much as Constitutional Petitions are required to be instituted by way of Petitions, Rule 10 (3) of the Mutunga Rules, provides that subject to Rule 9 and 10, the Court may accept an oral application, a letter or any other informal document which discloses denial, violation, infringement or threat to right or fundamental freedom; and thus the Mutunga Rules are drawn in such a manner that allows accommodation of an application that is not brought to Court by way of a Petition and the Courts are under an obligation to accept even an oral application, a letter or any other informal documentation, which discloses a denial, violation, infringement or threat to a right or fundamental freedom ; as read together with Rule 4 (1) of the Mutunga Rules that states that where any right or fundamental freedom provided for in the Constitution is allegedly denied, violated, infringed or threatened, a person affected or likely to be affected may make an application to the High Court in accordance with these rules ; and the Criminal Procedure Code in as in

(c.):-Civil remedies can't bar the filing of criminal charges cause one set of facts can be the foundation of a criminal charge & the basis for a civil action as is expressly contemplated by Statute in Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code titled "Concurrent Criminal and Civil Proceedings" which states that: 'Notwithstanding the provisions of  any other written law, the fact that any matter in issue in any criminal proceedings is also directly or substantially an issue in any pending civil proceedings and thus shall not be a ground for any stay, prohibition or delay of the criminal proceedings

Subject to the Discovery-Rule as read together with the 'Limitation of Actions Act' Cap. 22 as regards events of 'continuous-violations-of-the-law' such as in my case, the Statute of Limitations provides for the last possible date a violation might have occurred meaning the first-crime wouldn't expire and the series-of- crimes therefore are charged as one crime with the Statute-of-Limitations beginning after the last crime has been committed }... 

that exempt bureaucratic technicalities such as in my case to allow me present the submissions substantiating my complaints pending printing-and-scanning of the HELP-Form at a later date which for purposes of authenticity I can assure you it's the same me as in the attached Identity Card 20656845 and that it ain't no bot; a facet your offices can verify by calling me at: +254723047869 or +254764087863.

                                 I thus urge the ACC-Secretariat c/o OAG in accordance with the edict in Article 59 (4) to exercise its powers under Article 161 (2) (a) as read together with provisions of the Rules of Court Section 2 (1) regarding the National Policy Guideline on the Administration of Justice as concerns CAP 16 on the Advocates Act and LSK Acts as read together with the ( Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ) Practice and Procedure Rules 2013 that guide the institution and prosecution of Constitutional matters ; to thus process this applications under a certificate of urgency and commence it thenceforth as I wither-and-wane in virility short of Uhuru's-and-Raila's death-threats criminal-conspiracies political-legal abuses which endlessly violate my fundamental rights and freedoms as provided-for in :

-Article 25 that, "Despite  any other provision in this Constitution, the following rights and fundamental freedoms shall not be limited -(a) freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;

                 -(b) freedom from slavery or  servitude; 

                 -(c) the right to a fair trial; and 

                 -(d) the right to an order of habeas corpus ; 

-Article 27 that : 

                 -(1) Every  person is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law. 

                 -(2) Equality includes the full and equal enjoyment  of all rights and fundamental freedoms. 

                 -(4) The State shall not discriminate directly or  indirectly against any person on any ground, including race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, health status, ethnic or social origin, colour, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, dress, language or birth. 

                 -(5) A person shall not discriminate directly or indirectly against another person on any of the grounds  specified or contemplated in clause (4):-Article 28 on Dignity that: Every person has inherent dignity and  the  right  to have that dignity respected and protected.  -Article 29 that Every person has the right to  freedom and security of  the person, which includes the  right not to be :- 

                                                                         -(a) deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without  just cause; 

                                                                         -(b) detained  without trial, except during a  state of emergency,                                                                                    in which  case the detention is subject  to Article 58;         

                                                                         -(c) subjected to  any form of violence from  either public or                                                                                          private  sources;                                           

                                                                          -(d) subjected to  torture in any manner, whether physical or                                                                                         psychological; 

                                                                         -(e) subjected to  corporal punishment; or 

                                                                         

                                                                         -(f)  treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading                                                                                              manner.

         -Article 45 (2) that: Every adult has the right to marry a person of the                                                                                                    opposite sex, based on the free consent of the parties. 

         -Article 48 that: The State shall ensure access to justice for all persons                                                                                           and, if any fee is required, it shall be reasonable and shall not impede                                                                 access to justice. 

         -Article 50 (1) Every person has the right to have any dispute that can                                                                                           be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair and public                                                                           hearing before a court or, if appropriate, another independent and                                                                         impartial tribunal or body.

                           Please consider this a rough-draft preliminary advanced copy of my response pending proper type-setting cause of computer technicalities before the deadline of Sep 26th 2022. I also pray civil-society-groups / concerned authorities oblige the compulsive-neurotic, sex-pervert, dysfunctional family I've disowned pending due process as demonstrated in my broad lawsuit to jus' be cooking early in the next three days to enable me have enough time to trek to the cyber-café and complete these submissions.

                          Thank you in advance, 

                           Yours Faithfully,

                            Erick Mango.