Friday, December 30, 2022

163. Tummy-Constrict Starvations: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Thief Ruto's ACC / OAG AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+ Traffic Accident
Evidence-Destruction Damages Case Circus; TV News Resumed On 25th Dec
Since 2nd Oct; SOS. {31-12-2022 1011hrs:- Rags-washing postponed cause
witches continue 3-mandazis till supper starvations. SOS. {30-12-2022
2221hrs:- A ration supper was finally tabled around 2015hrs. SOS.
{1927hrs:- Starving like hell since morn. surviving on the stuff
mentioned below. It's on such days that the witches will cook a late
supper towards 2200hrs jus' to stretch the jealousy, evil-eyed sadist
torture. Spent half-the-day lying in bed cause of too much exhausted
energy-emaciation to hold the back sitting-up. SOS. {1002hrs:-
Evil-eyed jealousy witches continue the hunger-torture starvations
with unsustainable 3-'mandazis' and a cup of tea till supper. SOS.
{Need a wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 2 rug-tatter pairs
save-for-1, and shoes, worseningly wearing-off. Photos-evidence review
on-going. SOS.[
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/29/162

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 6-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating-and-marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: washing-bathing bar-soap,
toothpaste, wardrobe/shoes. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Thursday, December 29, 2022

162. Dehydration v 1 Jan Indoors: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Dear Sir / Madam, Brief: Thief Ruto's ACC / OAG AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+
Traffic Accident Evidence-Destruction Damages Case Circus; TV News
Resumed On 25th Dec Since 2nd Oct; SOS. { 29-12-2022 1810hrs:-
Remainning with 20/- for water of 4-trips at 5/- bob each. Hoping
s'body will chip-in to make a different day of the New Year 2023. SOS.
{ 1248hrs:- Brunch was another unsustainable 7-slices-of-bread and
2-cups of tea till supper tabled around noon. Gone to top it with
2-'mandazis' at 10/- bob last coin. Yesterday got a water-kiosk that
filled my 1.5l bottle for 5/-. Apparently, Migori's supplied by two
sources: NYAWASSCO and County. { 1047hrs:- Jealousy, evil-eyed
psychic-witches have already had their first breakfast serving while I
gotta guess hungry as if I'd asked to come to their abode. SOS. { Need
a wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 2 rug-tatter pairs
save-for-1, and shoes, worseningly wearing-off. Photos-evidence review
on-going. SOS. [
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/28/161a

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 6-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: washing-bathing bar-soap,
wardrobe/shoes. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Wednesday, December 28, 2022

161a. Dehydration vCSID/Starving: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Thief Ruto's ACC / OAG AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+ Traffic Accident
Evidence-Destruction Damages Case Circus; TV News Resumed On 25th Dec
Since 2nd Oct; SOS. { 28-12-2022 1126hrs:- Witches continue
hunger-tortures with a brunch of 5-slices-of-bread/tea I'll add
2-mandazis and search for water. SOS {27-12-2022 1455hrs:-Survived on
a brunch of paltry picked-beans tabled around 1355hrs, from a mix of
'CSID peristalsis-triggering unthrashed sucrose-maize' which I'll top
with 20/- bob last coins 4-'mandazis' once the rain subsides. If the
trend continues it may escalate to death-starvations. SOS{
1217hrs:-Hunger-torture starvations continue in the rain, cold and
winds as psychic-vampire-witches took their first breakfast serving
around 1000hrs while I gotta guess as if I'd asked to come to their
abode. SOS. {Need a wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 2
rug-tatter pairs save-for-1, and shoes, worseningly wearing-off.
Photos-evidence review on-going. SOS.[
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/25/160

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Tuesday, December 27, 2022

161. Peristalsis-Sucrose vStarve: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Dear Sir / Madam, Peristalsis-Sucrose Transexual Gay-Witch Diet v.
Starvation. SOS: Thief Ruto's ACC / OAG AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+ Traffic
Accident Evidence-Destruction Damages Case Circus; TV News Resumed On
25th Dec Since 2nd Oct; SOS. { 27-12-2022 1455hrs:- Survived on a
brunch of paltry picked-beans tabled at around 1355hrs, from a mix of
'CSID peristalsis-triggering unthrashed sucrose-maize' which I'll top
with 20/- bob last coins 4-'mandazis' once the rain subsides. If the
trend continues it may escalate to death-starvations. SOS. { 1217hrs:-
Hunger-torture starvations continue in the rain, cold and winds as
psychic-vampire-witches took their first breakfast serving around
1000hrs while I gotta guess as if I'd asked to come to their abode.
SOS. { Need a wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 2 rug-tatter
pairs save-for-1, and shoes, worseningly wearing-off. Photos-evidence
review on-going. SOS. [
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/25/160

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Sunday, December 25, 2022

160. Witches Swaying Minds: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to date or

25-12-2022 1501hrs:- A well-wisher spared me some cash I managed to
buy lunch and a chrome 250ml pending getting a shave. Otherwise, the
witches are upto swaying pples minds with every move, gesture or music
I listen to. Been listening to old school Lingala/Rhumba nostalgia
including in commemoration of Tshala Mwana's 'Karibu Yangu' who
recently left us. Woe unto you should the music mention pples' names
or describe events like Orchestre Les Mangelepa's 'Embakasi!' or
Tabuley's 'Manze.' I'm suppossedly speaking to a public with the
quickie-prostitute and gay-husband (substantiated) being the
interpreters of my dumbs' language. I ain't suppossed to reminisce the
goodol'days when the national and only TV broadcaster opened at
1800hrs and music was streamed by Fred Obachi Machoka; when there was
only one radio channel VoK pple crowded around during football matches
and you would hear the same EAC bands playing in the neighborhoods.
For swayed imbeciles, I use sound-logic for communication, ignore them
witches.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Saturday, December 24, 2022

159. Christmas, Starving Indoors: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Dear Sir / Madam, Psychic-Vampire-Witches Human Sacrifice Rituals
Indoors On Christmas, SOS. Thief and ICC-Indicted Ruto's ACC / OAG
AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+ Traffic Accident Evidence-Destruction Damages
Case Circus; TV News Still Shut Since 2nd Oct; SOS. { 25-12-2022
1001hrs:- Gay-witch came back but I couldn't touch the left meal for
their filthy, puky, disgusting, re-gurgling manners. Thus
starving-and-dehydrating indoors on Christmas. SOS. { 0849hrs:-
Christmas indoors on hunger-torture and unshaven-ragged in
rags-and-tatters as self-bleaching quickie-prostitute and gay-husband
witches(substantiated) already filled their tummies and left for town
as if I'd asked to come to their abode. S'thing small, a soft loan or
spare cash will go a long way to make some merry. SOS. { Need a
wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 3 rug-tatter pairs
worseningly wearing-off. Photos-evidence review on-going. SOS. [
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/23/158

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Thursday, December 22, 2022

158. Ruto/GoK/AG/CS Witch-hunts: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to dat

22-12-2022 1956hrs: Chief/cops witch-hunt me as Ruto's GoK c/o CS
Interior Kindiki and/or the AG Muturi persecute me over the ACC-Appeal
/ broad lawsuit they wonna obliterate to defeat justice. First 'twas
plainclothed Chief and 2-cops who timed my coming outta the Bansi
Supermarket where I'd bought a 250ml Chrome to drown my frustrations
with the transparency-and-contempt issues the ACC process was
developing when they stopped me asking for the bottle maliciously
accusing me of drinking by the road; I shook the unscrewed bottle
upside-down to their dismay-and-embarassment. When peniless to afford
only spirits I drink at my quarters! This Sunday around 1600hrs
another cop manning the traffic across opp. Bansi timed my passing-by
to signal like he wanted to call me 'cept he was headed to attend to
s'thing at the road and so chose the latter. If Ruto's processed an
arrest-or-search warrant let them come for me straight but stop the
harassments. SOS. {
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/22/157

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 13:31:52 +0600
Subject: GoK Witch-huntings
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

157. Ruto / GoK Witch-huntings:- Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to dat

Dear Sir / Madam, Thief and ICC-Indicted Ruto's ACC / OAG
AMACO-INSURANCE 10m+ Traffic Accident Evidence-Destruction Damages
Case Circus; TV News Still Shut Since 2nd Oct; SOS. { 22-12-2022
2004hrs:- Chief and cops c/o Ruto's AMACO-Insurance Co. now targetting
/ picking-on-me to wonna sabotage the ACC-Appeal and broad lawsuit
(details coming in next update / post). SOS. { 19-12-2022 1718hrs:- I
survived on 4-'mandazis' and water at 20/- bob till supper. Closing
the year yet again in rags-and-tatters. SOS. { 1300hrs:- The jealousy,
evil-eyed witches continue the hunger-torture
one-meal-ration-every-24hrs-at-supper starvations as they stuff their
tummies with first breakfast servings and lunch in the outter-kitchen
as if I'd asked to come to their abode ; and now any spare-cash I get
depletes on food. SOS. { Need a bic-razor, wardrobe urgently due to
current oversewn 3 rug-tatter pairs worseningly wearing-off.
Photos-evidence review on-going. SOS. [
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/18/156

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 23:28:53 +0600
Subject: GoK Witch-hunting
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Sunday, December 18, 2022

156. Death vWitches' Archetyping: Prayers for Humanitarian Visa, Asylum Protection, Self-Determination and Rule-of-Law from Uhuru, Raila, co-conspirators and their Jinn-Theocracy GoK Sanctioned political-legal abuse, delayed-denied justice, outlawing, endless-persecution, rape-of-conscience, gaslighting, mandatory-systems-of-committment and death; Prayers too for soft loans to draft, type-set, e-file and litigate my broad lawsuit. (NB: The above is meant solely for asylum-visa embassies and concerned civil-society-groups / authorities; the defendant pariah-state GoK and its agencies aren't party). Had a gloomy Christmas / New Year 2021 in rags with custom ritual hunger-torture, stomach-constricting muscular-dystrophy predisposing 'Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency' starchy-sucrose diets' exploiting-starvations as Uhuru's Zombie-Child-Physique making-of-archetypes prehistoric-descendant-culture Death-Cult's imposed penniless-pauperism wanes my virility in captivity unable to da

Thief and ICC-Indicted Ruto's ACC / OAG AMACO-INSURANCE 10m Traffic
Accident Evidence-Destruction Damages Case Circus; TV News Still Shut
Since 2nd Oct; SOS. [ 18-12-2022 1015hrs:- Self-bleaching
quickie-prostitute and gay-husband witches (substantiated) continue
the death-starvation hunger-tortures amid the manipulated water-kiosks
dehydrations; they've taken their first breakfast serving even as I
recuperate from the recent starvation series having survived on a
paper-thin chapati-surwa yesterday till supper as I spent the last
coins on the final ACC-Appeal submission. It's Sunday my rags-washing
day they want me to drop for their witches' 'making of archetypes'
mud-smearing. Flashing well-wishers as rags-washing hangs. May wash a
rag after supper as both witches have left for town i.e. starvation.
SOS. { Need a bic-razor, wardrobe urgently due to current oversewn 3
rug-tatter pairs worseningly wearing-off. Photos-evidence review
on-going. SOS. [
https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/155

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erick Mango <erickmango4521@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:37:51 +0600
Subject: 104 pics
To: erickmango4521@gmail.com





--
As Uhuru's GoK compromises my latest 7-8 page statement charges of
OB61/23/08/2021 { https://wp.me/pb6oyO-6Ci } on SOA No. 3 of 2006 and
PADVA of 2015, even as they brood-sit pretty on my now 10yrs 3-months
10m+ damages { https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/17/final
}, imposing a pauperism-bachelorhood on me at 44yrs compromising my
dating and marriage, I routinely need bare-minimums to meet
hygiene-decency basics including now: wash-bath barsoap, shave,
bic-razor, belt, wardrobe. Ain't living or working in
narcissistic-Godzilla-Raila's Luo-Nyanza. SOS #FreedBritney
#turpinfamily {
https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/07/prayers-for-migration-for-political.html
{ https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2021/06/sos-aid-salvage-kshs-10m-in-litigation.html
{ https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/devel {
https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5bQ {
https://activistsadvocacy.blogspot.com/2021/10/email-signature-and-footnotes.html
{ https://wp.me/pb6oyO-5JI {
https://www.hapity.com/view-broadcast/2387

Saturday, December 17, 2022

Final Appeal Submission Subject To Deadline Extension On The Decision of The Advocates Complaints Commission By The Secretary at Cooperative Building, 20th Floor, Nairobi, Delivered-and-Issued On Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM In COMPLAINT-CC/PE/AUG/22/36:- I Squeezed Final Submission Vol. 12 Subject To Deadline Extension To The ACC-Secretariat: Ombudsman-Kisumu PDF-Attachment back to square-A ACC c/o OAG: GoK sadist, animist-witch, GLBTQ-Occultist ex-President Uhuru's and co. political-legal abuse endemic, systemic-and-systematic corruption continued sanctioned endless-persecution ( for purposes of shielding his criminal co-conspirators, accomplices and bosom-buddies from persecution ) to embezzle me my now 10yrs 4-months Kihara-Construction accident evidence-destruction / spoliation continuous-violations-of-the-law series-of-crimes 10m+ litigation damages case as Ombudsman-Kisumu finally replied on 25th July 2022 on a PDF-letter addressed way back on 28th April 2022 even before the Ombudsman-Nairobi contacted me on 23rd May 2022. I pray the divine-intervention of civil-society-groups / concerned authorities to fasttrack arrest-and-prosecution of the impunity for purposes of expediting payment of my risked damages as I wane in virility at 44yrs of imposed pauperism unable to date or marry. SOS.

Dear Sir / Madam,
I managed under impossible circumstances of sickness, power-and-internet blackout manipulations by my antagonists the adversely-mentioned suspects incriminated in my broad lawsuit to conclude submissions for the matter below within the fall of the prescribed thirty-days for appeals unless the Appellate Advocates Complaints Commission c/o Office of the Attorney General chose to add me some additional time to exhaust the same.
Additionally, I've enjoined the National Legal Aid Service as stipulated under Section 40 as read together with Section 41 of the Legal Aid Act 'on procedure-and-eligibilityrespectively and since the NLAS also falls under the same 
Office of the Attorney General, and for purposes of consolidating convenience, have I hence opted not to write a separate letter but enjoin them in this same correspondence ; that they grant me, the GoK-imposed indigent Petitioner-Appellant the requisite legal-aid as roughly estimated financially in bare-minimums in these links:.. 
-( https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2022/11/acc-complaint-ccpeaug2236-nairobi.html ) or 
-( https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/11/01/acc-complaint-cc-pe-aug-22-36-nairobi-headquarters-meeting-feedback-travel-logistics-funds-plea-sos-i-squeezed-final-submission-vol-12-subject-to-deadline-extension-to-the-acc-secretariat-om/ )
...subject to such terms-and-conditions as the Service considers appropriate and/or guidance by the Appellate Advocates Complaints Commission or the Attorney General or both ; in the instance they should implore me to approach the Commission offices at Cooperative Building , 20th Floor, Nairobi, for a full-fledged Hearing ..; unless they opt instead to form an ad-hoc committee and take the 1-2 hrs flight to the airstrip in Homabay then travel for an hour or so by road to Migori Town ( a thirty minute stroll from where I temporarily reside under siege ) where there have risen lotsa recent upscale hotels that can decently accommodate the ranks of Senior State Counsels for as long as it would be convenient for them to facilitate a properly-constituted competent Hearing to enable me "argue my case...on an equal footing."...as regards equal access to justice and not occasioning the vulnerable substantial injustice. After all the Advocates Disciplinary Tribunal is devolved to some regions.
Otherwise, I pray for the divine-intervention of civil-society-groups / concerned-authorities to impress upon the Appellate Advocates Complaints Commission c/o Office of the Attorney General to Certify the cited Appeal-Complaint No. CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as Amended below as Urgent and hear it henceforth as complete-submission with regards to dispensing the service of the application in the first instance due to the nature of the 10-yrs 6-months political-legal abuse delays and the reliefs sought.
Thank you in advance.
Yours Faithfully,
Erick Mango.


(A.):- Introduction

1.-The Respondent-Advocates Complaints Commission's DECISION against me the Indigent-Appellant in the subordinate cause was based on my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as submitted then, of I the Indigent Petitioner/Plaintiff  Erick Otieno Mango Versus the Defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) which was anchored on :-

"the tort of professional negligence-and-liability as concerns breach-of-duty and nuisance with regards to continuous-violations-of-the-law traffic-accident evidence-destruction / spoliation series-of-crimes political-legal abuses involving Owade & Co. Advocates in cahoots with Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) conjunctively with accomplices and co-conspirators including Migori Police Station Traffic Police and Kihara-Construction, plus two ex-Chiefs of Suna East Amara and Odero-and-his-son, plus Peter-and-Pamela Mango the dysfunctional, compulsive-neurotic sex-perverts I've disowned pending due process… as detailed in the attached blog-site authorities links memos-letter correspondences to civil-society-groups and concerned authorities" ; as cited in Per Anderson B in "Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co. 1865 "that the tort-of-Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do."

2.-That pursuant to the said basis-of-my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as submitted then, which the Advocates Complaints Commission went forth to reiterate therein above that the mandate of the Commission as lies within Section 53 of the Advocates Act is to deal with complaints against advocates, law firms or their employees for acts of professional misconduct, not tort; and further, that my allegation wasn't be backed by any evidence authorizing them to inquire deeper into the complaint, thus lacked 'substance'.

3.-I hereby take this solemn opportunity in application pursuant to the provisions of Order 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 as read together with Section 214 of the Criminal Procedure Code to seek orders that I the Indigent Petitioner-Appellant be granted leave to AMEND this Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 lodged with the Commission from the 19th August 2022 through to the submission deadline of 4th October 2022 because of my govt. of Kenya's political-legal imposed indigent / penniless-pauperism status which couldn't allow me to lodge it in one piece and instead had to in bits-and-piecespremised on grounds set-out as follows:-

(a.):-"That the proposed amendments are intended to bring before this Honorable 'Appellant-Advocates Complaints Commission' the real matters in controversy between the Parties herein so that the same are determined on their true and substantive merits.

(b.):-The proposed amendments are further necessitated by information relevant for the fair and just determination of the real questions in controversy in this appeal which came to me, the Petitioner-Appellant/Applicant's knowledge subsequent to the filing of the Petition.

(c.):-The time allowed under the Civil Procedure Act and Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice Procedure Rules 2013 for amendment of Petition has not expired.

(d.):-The proposed amendments will not occasion any prejudice to the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission ;

(e.):-The proposed amendments arise out of the same facts or substantially the same facts in respect of which relief is claimed by the Petitioner-Appellant/Applicant ;

(f.):-It is therefore in the interest of justice that I the Petitioner-Appellant/Applicant should be granted leave to amend its Petition filed herein."

4.-In that context, I aver that the issue of amendment of pleadings is not novel and has been the subject of numerous Court decisions, the common denominator being that as a general principle, Courts will normally allow amendment of pleadings at any stage of the proceedings if it can be done without occasioning injustice or prejudice to the other party and which prejudice can be compensated by an award of costs - See generally Eastern Bakery vs Castelino (1958) EA 461, Ochieng and Others vs First National Bank of Chicago Civil Appeal No. 149 of 1991 and Kenya Commercial Bank vs Kenyatta National Hospital & Another (2003) 2 EA.

5.-My Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 being as much a Constitutional Petition as far as the Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms go the rules of procedure applicable are the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013. In that regard, Rule 18 of the Rules provides that, "a party that wishes to amend its pleadings at any stage of the proceedings may do so with the leave of the Court". As to the applicability of that Rule, in The Institute for Social Accountability and Another vs Parliament of Kenya and 2 Others Petition No.71 of 2013, the Court stated that;

"Rule 18 of the Rules clearly stipulates that the court may permit an amendment at any stage of the proceedings. The court will normally allow parties to make such amendments as may be necessary for determining the real questions in controversy or to avoid a multiplicity of suits, provided there has been no undue delay, no new or inconsistent cause of action is introduced, and no vested interest or accrued legal right is affected and that the amendment can be allowed without an injustice to the other side." 

6.-In this regard I also rely by Precedent aka Case-law or Common-Law on the case of The Institute for Social Accountability (supra) where the Court stated as follows as regards the purpose of amendments;

"The object of amendments is to enable the parties to alter their pleadings so as to ensure that the litigation between them is conducted, not on the false hypothesis of the facts already pleaded or the relief or remedy already claimed, but rather on the basis of the true state of the facts which the parties really and finally intend to rely on. The power of amendment makes the function of the court more effective in determining the substantive merits of the case rather than holding it captive to form of the action or proceedings."


7.-In applying the above principles here, I the Petitioner-Appellant am of the view that the ends of justice will be achieved and the principles and values enunciated in the Public Officer Ethics Act, 2003 (POEA), the Leadership and Integrity Act (LIA), 2011, Chapter Six and Article 73 of the Constitution of Kenya-2010 will better be served if this Appeal in my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as AMENDED herein is allowed and the issues in contest dealt with wholly. 

8.-Chapter Six of the Constitution of Kenya-2010 provides Leadership and Integrity requirements while the Public Officer Ethics Act, 2003 (POEA), the Leadership and Integrity Act (LIA), 2011 and other relevant regulations prescribe the codes of Ethics and Conduct for public officers.  Article 73provides for the thresholds of personal integrity, competence and suitability prerequisites for any appointments.

9.-Chapter Six CoK-2010 further obligates all public officers to behave in manners that safeguard the dignity-and-honour of the offices and promote public confidence in the integrity of the offices ; which emphatically with Article 3 CoK-2010 obligates us citizens whom sovereignty lies-with, to respect, uphold and protect the Constitution ; as read together with Section 4(1) of the Leadership and Integrity Act (LIA), 2011, which apportions responsibility on every person to implement the provision of the Leadership and Integrity Act (LIA), 2011 ; either and/or by seeking legal redress for any contraventions of Chapter Six and integrity requirements. In this instance I rely on the precedent / case law authority in both :- 

(a.):-Watitu and Mumo Matemu, where the Court of Appeal affirmed that any Kenyan has the locus standi in seeking judicial redress on breach of Chapter Six provided the person acts in good faith and for public good ; and

(b.):-Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance Vs the AG & Others, Nairobi, HC Pet. No. 229 of 2012.-"Kenyans intended that Chapter Six and Article 73 will be enforced in the spirit in which they included them in the Constitution. The people of Kenya did not intend that these provisions on integrity and suitability for public offices be merely suggestions, superfluous or ornamental; they did not intend to include these provisions as lofty aspirations." 

10.-At this point, this 'Appellate Advocates Complaints Commission' is not concerned with the substantive merits of me the Petitioner-Appellant's case as those are matters that will be canvassed at the HEARING and I am therefore satisfied that the AMENDMENT will help the Court conclusively determine the issue before it and declining the AMENDMENT at this stage may only lead to the filing of another suit and such an approach would negate the principles of judicial authority enunciated in Article 159(2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 that all suits should be expeditiously determined.

11.-I thus urge the  Advocates-Complaints-Commission-and-its-Secretary c/o OAG being the principal regulator of the legal profession in Kenya in accordance with the edict in  Advocates Act Section 53 Cap 16, mandating it to protect the general public in matters touching to, incidental or ancillary to the law, to hence  exercise its powers under Section 57 & 60(1)(2)(3) with regards to expeditiously investigating-and-prosecuting the adversely mentioned unscrupulous Owade & Co. Advocates and 
Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) lawyers' aggravated professional-misconducts Breach-of-Contracts in each respective instance since they flouted-and-violated mandatory procedure in statutory-and-constitutional guidelines choosing to rather engage in alien procedure that resulted in illegalities grounding my claims for violation-infringement of my fundamental rights-and-freedoms ; as read together with Sec 61(3) on the OAG exercise of disciplinary powersand as read together with Sec 61(1) on binding orders and Sec 31 Advocates Act Cap 16 on advocates offences ; as well as read together with Sec 53(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) and Sec 4(b)(e) and Sec 57(1)(2)(3)(4); not to mention as read together with the LSK Act Cap 18, Cap 15 & Article 59(4); and the provisions of the Rules of Court on the administration of the Evidence Act CAP 80 encompassing the rules and legal principles that govern the proof of facts in legal proceedings besides generally referring to that which is used to prove facts in issue or facts from which facts-in-issue may be deduced ; as read together with the Practice and Procedure Rules 2013 aka ("Mutunga Rules") of which the overriding scope-and-objective is to facilitate access to justice for all persons with regards to enforcement of the Bill of Rights under Article 22(3) as concerns the Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms...  as read together with Article 23 and Article 165 (3) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya ; for which in this regard, Sub rule 4 provides that the Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under the Mutunga Rules shall facilitate the just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of all cases ; and where-by furthermore, Sub rule 7 states that the Court shall pursue access to justice for all persons including the poor, illiterate, uninformed, unrepresented, and persons with disabilities... as read together with Articles 47 on administrative-dysfunctions or impunity in the context of  administrative-action in Article 59(1) (h)(i)(k); to thus process this Application under a Certificate-of-Urgency and commence HEARING it thenceforth in the first instance due to the nature of the 10 years 5 months Uhuru's, Raila's (in my broad lawsuit) and now Ruto's AMACO-INSURANCE criminal-conspiracies' political-legal abuses delays, and reliefs-sought amid death-threats which endlessly violate my fundamental rights and freedoms as provided-for in Articles 25(a-d), 27(1-5), 28, 29(a-f) 45(2), 48 and 50(1) as demonstrated explicitly-and-implicitly in detail in my correspondences to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blog-sites including;
(a.):-https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2016/05/prosecuting-raila-ex-treason-convict_24.html )-The Kihara-Construction Traffic-Accident KAS-535K Chronicles ;
(b.):-https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2016/06/prosecuting-raila-ex-treason-convict.html )-More on the Kihara-Construction Traffic-Accident KAS-535K Chronicles ;
(c.):-( https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2016/10/prosecuting-raila-ex-treason-convict_26.html )- Broad lawsuit detailing the violated-and-infringed Rights-and-Fundamental Freedoms including the Campaign-Plea Portfolio, Charge-Sheet, Amicus Curiae and Complaints-File ;
(e.):-https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/developing-updates-10-on-medical-battery-negligence-malpractice-charges-alternated-with-witchcraft-and-enforced-disappearances-i-urge-the-cj-in-accordance-with-the-edict-in-article-10-cok-2010/ )-GoK Covax-syringes poker / medical-battery / negligence / malpractice criminal-conspiracy details including how my Rights-and-Fundamental Freedoms are violated-and-infringed endlessly;
(h.):-https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/09/26/vol-10 )-05-09-2022 They killed the ICC witnesses one by one (the latest being ICC lawyer Paul Gicheru Sep 26) to exonerate themselves in any future investigations or proceedings ;
(i.):-( https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/12/15/154a-water-food-v-acc-appeal-prayers-for-humanitarian-visa-asylum-protection-self-determination-and-rule-of-law-from-uhuru-raila-co-conspirators-and-their-jinn-theocracy-gok-sanctioned-politi/ )-GoK-imposed indigence starvation-dehydration elaborate funeral-rites plus photo-exhibition of the broad lawsuit details including how my Rights-and-Fundamental Freedoms are violated-and-infringed endlessly ;
(j):-( https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/ )-GoK endless-persecution political-legal abuse broad lawsuit photo-exhibition details including how my Rights-and-Fundamental Freedoms are violated-and-infringed endlessly ;
and https://www.pd.co.ke/news/ruto-cabinet-secretaries-sworn-in-155630/ )-whereby on the dawn of swearing-in his cabinet the corrupt thief and ICC-Indicted William Samoei Ruto made orders for my internet to be cut jus' as I was 'bout to present my final-submission of the Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 to the Advocates-Complaints-Commission-and-its-Secretary c/o Attorney General Justin Muturi who happens to be his political buddy. Simple math...you can join-the dots or add 1+1 ;
(m):-( https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2022/09/126-dictator-ruto-cuts-internet-prayers.html  )
-( https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/09/28/126-dictator-ruto-cuts-internet-prayers-for-humanitarian-visa-asylum-protection-self-determination-and-rule-of-law-from-uhuru-raila-co-conspirators-and-their-jinn-theocracy-gok-sanctioned-politi/ )-on '28-09-22 0858hrs: Elaborate Funeral-Death-Starvation Human-Sacrifice-Ceremony Rituals: Dictator Ruto and probable murderer of ICC lawyer Paul Gicheru cuts-off my internet-Safaricom since dawn. Life and ACC-Sec hanging on a string save for 7MB Equitel bundle depleting anytime' ;
(n.):-( https://erick-mango.blogspot.com/2022/09/125-padv-act-ob6123082021-prayers-for.html )
-( https://startrextraterrestrials.wordpress.com/2022/09/30/127-www-ob61-23-08-21-padv-soacts-prayers-for-humanitarian-visa-asylum-protection-self-determination-and-rule-of-law-from-uhuru-raila-co-conspirators-and-their-jinn-theocracy-gok-sanctioned-politi)-on 'Internet-Safaricom connection's back on my phone jus' checked though ma heart skips a beat when and if the power-of-darkness executive should disconnect me off-guard penniless without enough bal. to buy the min. equitel bundle at 6/- ? Talk of forced disappearances and murders. I pray concerned authorities guarantee me 24/7 connection. SOS.' 

...as I wither-and-wane in virility, unable to neither kick-start my stalled businesses, date nor marry at 45 years by January 2023.

(B.):- Background

12.-In order to fully understand me, the Petitioner-Appellant's Application, it is imperative to highlight the gist of my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36. In my subsequent Submission dated Wed, Nov 16 at 5:27 PM  I averred that Senior State Counsel Leah M Mutua who is the Secretary of the Advocates Complaints Commission violated the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act No 46 of 2016 aka Contempt-of-Court or of Judicial-Process or Contempt-in-Procedure, or just Civil-Contempt which are quasi-criminal in nature and consist-and-refer to conduct of parties abusing the judicial process to the irritation-and-annoyance of their opponents for purposes of interfering with the efficient-and-effective administration of justice by impeding-and-perverting the course of the same through failing to comply with court-orders, directions of tribunals or breaching of judicial-processes undertakings { Osborne's Concise Law Dictionary, P. 102  and Kenyalaw.org } and Chapter Six of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 as she continued to discharge her responsibilities as the Secretary of the Advocates Complaints Commission... as demonstrated in the Wed, Nov 16 at 5:27 PM  letter's caption below...:-

"Dear Sir / Madam,
                            Briefly, after I'd managed to complete up to between 90-95% of the ACC c/o OAG submission-presentations exhausting the issues raised by the ACC-Secretary who'd cut the Nairobi-HQ travel-lodging meeting logistics expenses to a phone-call finally called past their programmed-schedule of 'in the course of the week' between 7-11th November, 2022 this morning on Monday, November 14, 2022 repeating the same issues I'd already exhausted in my written-submissions and/or as lodged in their portal; though my phone battery died midway.
                The bone-of-contention is that the ACC-Secretary had asked on (Thursday, November 3, 2022) to  "allow me to call you in the course of the coming week to better explain what the mandate of the Commission entails;only for her to change tune on calling and instead revert to more-or-less what seemed like a 'Direct Examination' for a Deposition! 
                        I'd been psyched or prepared for a 'Tell-and-Explain' listening-session and thought I was going to be oriented on a dissection of what 'hot airs,' 'wild-goose-chases' or 'piki piki ponkies' vis-a-vis 'matters-and-facts of law' my written-submissions entailed with regards to the Advocates-Complaints-Commission mandates; yet to my surprise I got instead what appeared to be a Q&A Direct-Examination seemingly to corroborate-or-authenticate the written and portal-lodged submissions. It was a deliberate, intentional disorientation to throw an unsuspecting political-legally abused indigent off-wind for which I'd to find my own bearings in two days of reflective inquiry and conclude the above that 'twas an Oral-Deposition to corroborate and authenticate the written. 
                     I stand to be corrected if I'm mistaken and hence, feeling short-changed hereby hold the Commission and Secretary personally-and-collectively liable, responsible and accountable for any misconceptions, damages or torts accruing from the same including generally: 
              (1.):-Contempt-of-Court or Judicial-Process aka Contempt-in-Procedure, Civil-Contempt which are quasi-criminal in nature and consist-and-refer to conduct of parties abusing the judicial process to the irritation-and-annoyance of their opponents for purposes of interfering with the efficient-and-effective administration of justice by impeding-and-perverting the course of the same through failing to comply with court-orders, directions of tribunals or breaching of judicial-processes undertakings { Osborne's Concise Law Dictionary, P. 102  and Kenyalaw.org }; contrary to the Contempt of Court Act No 46 of 2016.
              My conscience rests in the 'benefit of doubt' I rendered the  Advocates-Complaints-Commission-and-Secretary in concluding 'twas rather a 'Direct-Examination' Deposition following my reflective-inquiry on their suspicious, unbecoming conducts in the opaque manner they run their operations. Otherwise, I smell a rat in ICC-Indicted mass-murderers and thieves who've taken-over the govt. with a paltry 7.1m votes outta the registered 22m voters in the name of William Ruto behind-the-scenes who's selectively had corrupt economic-crimes cartel cases of his cronies dropped as is demonstrated in the links below ; and is known to be a shrewd poacher of political-parties opponents by bribes and thus the ACC must be bending to his whims in fear of political-repercussions including losing their jobs should they deliver unfavorable judgments or attempt to bring his defendant company AMACO-INSURANCE to book and prosecute them for my KShs 10m+ damages delayed for the past 10yrs 15 months."

(C.):-Contentious Issues Mis-interpreted In Law-and-Fact, Mis-informed, Mis-comprehended, Mis-directed, Mis-guided, Mis-led by The learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary In Arriving At Their Inconclusive, Defective, Arbitrary, Biased, Discriminative, Political-Legal Abuse Decision...Herein Exhaustively Addressed and/or Re-Addressed by Me The Petitioner-Appellant

13.-(a.):-The Mandate of the Advocates Complaints Commission

The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary averred inter alia erroneously that:-

(a1.)-"...if it appears to the Commission whether before or after investigation that there is substance in the complaint but that the matter complained of constitutes or appears to constitute a disciplinary offence it shall forthwith refer the matter to the Disciplinary Committee;..."

Petitioner-Appellant Argument:

-The overwhelming evidence knowingly, deliberately and intentionally disregarded-and-discarded by the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary to shield-and-exonerate the renown, corrupt thief-and-murderer, ICC-Indicted executive William Samoei Ruto from prosecution and liabilities clearly demonstrates that my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as amended is indeed a prima facie case as is proved beyond reasonable doubt by the documents subpoenaed upon Penninah Ngondi Wawira, Prosecution Counsel in the ODPP ( which the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary knowingly, deliberately and intentionally rushed to evade-and-dismiss their relevance-and-credibility for the same ends above ) to produce containing the signatures, rubber stamps, venues, dates and all of the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) indicating their breaches-of-contracts they undertook halfway in each respective instance before being persuaded otherwise by the adversely mentioned 'powers-of-darkness' President William Samoei Ruto who owns the AMACO-INSURANCE Company, directly or indirectly by proxies.

(a2.)-"...During our tele-conversation with the complainant on 14th November 2022, I informed you that all complaints received by the Commission must first pass through the sieve to ensure that they have 'merit' or as described above, 'substance'...For the Commission to decide whether or not a complaint has 'merit' or 'substance' the same is weighed based on the 'evidence' adduced otherwise what would make a complaint worth of pursuit stand out from any other allegation made by anyone against another? The Commission in its implementation of its mandate relies entirely on evidence in determining whether or not a complaint falls within the constraints of what the Commission deals with, being allegations against advocates for acts of professional misconduct..." ;
-Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-The overwhelming evidence as submitted in my prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as amended and as subpoenaed upon Penninah Ngondi Wawira, Prosecution Counsel in the ODPP  to produce the listed documentary evidence containing the 
signatures, rubber stamps, venues, dates and all of the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) indicating the half-baked breaches-of-contracts they undertook halfway in each respective instance before being persuaded otherwise in behind-the-scenes-corruption by the adversely mentioned 'powers-of-darkness' President William Samoei Ruto who owns the AMACO-INSURANCE Company, directly or indirectly by proxies... is water-tightly full-and-bursting under the weight of merit-and-substance with regards to the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) professional-misconducts' grievous disciplinary offences. The evidences the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary rushed in their discriminative, political-legal abuse, arbitrary-decision to shield-and-exonerate the renown, corrupt thief-and-murderer, ICC-Indicted 
executive William Samoei Ruto from prosecution and liabilities as is clearly demonstrated in my prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 
as amended.

(a3.)-"...You have been informed and reminded of our mandate in our letters to you and the importance of documentary evidence. Complaints without evidence are merely allegations without proof..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-I've proved my allegations against the accused unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) beyond reasonable doubt with the listed documentary-evidence subpoenaed upon Penninah Ngondi Wawira, Prosecution Counsel in the ODPP  to produce containing the signatures, rubber stamps, venues, dates and all of the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) indicating the half-baked breaches-of-contracts they undertook halfway in each respective instance...and that the respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary are playing hard to expunge-and-obliterate in the same manner-and-pattern the mentioned suspects-and-accomplices / co-conspirators engaged-in in continuous-violations-of-the-law traffic-accident evidence-destruction / spoliation series-of-crimes political-legal abuse.

    (b.):-Proof of Payment
The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary averred inter alia erroneously that:-
(b1.)-"...An advocate, as in any other profession, is entitled to legal fees for professional services rendered within the course of his professional duty. Section 46 of the Advocates Act explains more in Advocate's remuneration and further states that '... such agreement shall be valid and binding on the parties PROVIDED IT IS IN WRITING and signed by the client or his agent duly authorized on that behalf.'  In the Help Form filed and signed by yourself on 18th August 2022, you indicated that you had paid the advocate legal fees but then went ahead to state that it was an '..abuse of the court process to ask for proof of payment of legal fees...' Take note that 'He who alleges must prove'..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-I urge the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary to take note first-and-foremost that the quoted citation '... such agreement shall be valid and binding on the parties PROVIDED IT IS IN WRITING and signed by the client or his agent duly authorized on that behalf.'... is in the Advocates Act  CAP 16 Section 45(1) on 'Agreements with respect to remuneration' and not Section 46 on 'Invalid agreements' as wrongfully-and-misguidedly alleged.
-Secondly, the other citation '..abuse of the court process...' is not with-reference-to their 'asking for proof of payment of legal fees...,' which's a blatant, glaring, intentional misinterpretation of the matter-in-law-and-fact in order to misdirect-and-misguide the proceedings so as to subvert-and-obstruct the due course of the law and arrive at a prejudiced, predetermined, defective conclusion favorably engineered to exonerate the accused unscrupulous Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) and hence effectively shield the corrupt thief-and-murderer, ICC-Indicted executive William Samoei Ruto's AMACO-INSURANCE Company from liabilities-and-prosecution...; but rather that it's in reference to basing the lawful requirement on the mandatory statutory-and-constitutional provisions that the unscrupulous 
Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) had in the very first respective instances knowingly, intentionally, deliberately, unlawfully and illegally ignored-and-omitted in their professional misconduct endeavors. 
-This is one of the issues I've extensively exhausted in proof beyond reasonable doubt in my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 originally even before the amendments herein, in a submission entitled 'On ISSUE No. 2 of availing proof of payment of the legal fees to the advocate(s)' and found in the links :-
-A fact which's another pointer to the complacency and/or corruption-behind-the-scenes of the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary as relates to misleading-and-misguiding notions and misinterpretation of matters-and-facts in law, and/or selective bias of cases in abuse-of-authority-and-powers / office as regards never reading submissions let alone analyzing-or-evaluating them.
-I urge the the  Appellate Advocates Complaints Commission to review the said submission without the need of repeating the submission herein and come-up with a competent-and-independent assessment. Otherwise, briefly for purposes of clarity,
'The paid legal fees' referred to the KSh 100 paid to Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) for the purposes of 'opening-a-file' office procedure" ; while
-The ref. 'abuse of the court process to ask for proof of legal fees' is with respect to public policy practice that prohibits a party from benefiting from an illegality that they were a party to as was demonstrated when D. Njogu & Company Advocates in 'Njogu & Company Advocates v National Bank of Kenya Limited [2016] eKLR)' appealed such a decision, whereby the Court of Appeal reiterated that 'it is an abuse of court process for the advocate to seek the Court's intervention in basing its fees on the Advocates Remuneration Order whose provisions he had in the first instance deliberately ignored.'
-I indeed submitted therein in my prima facie original Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 submission titled 'On ISSUE No. 2 of availing proof of payment of the legal fees to the advocate(s)' that first-and-foremost that 'it's an abuse of the court process to ask for proof of payment of legal-fees since such a transaction's based-on or assumes basis of the requisite Advocates Remuneration Order whose provisions the unscrupulous Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) had in the first instances knowingly, intentionally, deliberately, unlawfully and illegally ignored-and-omitted in their professional misconduct endeavors. The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretariat c/o OAG couldn't therefore allow misconceptionally for the accused culprit advocates to maintain proceedings whose objective defectively avoids or circumvents unprofessional, fraudulent, deficient agreements / contracts in order to exonerate themselves from any future binding liabilities as per Sec 45(1) of the Advocates Act which allows advocates and their clients to enter into agreements with respect to the advocate's remuneration.
-Furthermore, in as far as it's a deliberate attempt to misinterpret the law for purposes of misguiding-and-misleading the proceedings for the goal of subverting-and-obstructing the due course-of-the-law and defeat justice so as to shield-and-exonerate the thief and ICC-Indicted executive William Samoei Ruto and his AMACO-INSURANCE Company Ltd, with regards to the prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 ...The Courts have categorically stated that they have an obligation to interpret the laws in a purposive manner so as to illuminate the spirit of the laws. The High Court declared provisions of law exempting suspension of a state officer prosecuted on corruption and economic crimes are in clear contradiction with Chapter Six which obligates all public officers to behave in a manner that safeguards the dignity and honour of the office and promotes public confidence in the integrity of the office. In both Watitu and Mumo Matemu, the Court of Appeal affirmed that any Kenya has the locus standi in seeking judicial redress on breach of Chapter Six provided the person acts in good faith and for public good.
-It is my case that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary had no locus standi to circumvent statutory-and-constitutional procedure due to advocates-clients contracts as denoted inSec 45(1) of the Advocates Act CAP 16 and instead ask for evidence based on a law the advocates had obliterated intentionally for the quoted end-goals as envisaged inSection 46(b)(c) of the Advocates Act CAP 16 on invalid-agreements explains more in Advocate's remuneration and further states that '... such agreement shall be valid and binding on the parties PROVIDED IT IS IN WRITING and signed by the client or his agent duly authorized on that behalf.'
-The rest of the pleadings therein are as found in the cited prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 submissions and can be printed-and-downloaded the provided links herein: 

(b2.)"...Kindly note that proof of payment in your case would act as evidence that you indeed instructed the advocate, paid a retainer fee for which the Commission would then have authority to inquire from the advocate(s)under which circumstances had he/they received the money paid by you. We wish to reiterate that 'merit' or 'substance' is sourced from evidence, which in this case, is missing...."
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-The 'merit' or 'substance' sourced from evidence of a fee-agreement that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary misguidedly allege is missing to indicate I indeed instructed the advocates, is again underscored in the argument above in my prima facie original Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 submission titled 'On ISSUE No. 2 of availing proof of payment of the legal fees to the advocate(s)' that first-and-foremost that 'it's an abuse of the court process to ask for proof of payment of legal-fees since such a transaction's based-on or assumes basis of the requisite Advocates Remuneration Order whose provisions the unscrupulous Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) had in the first instances knowingly, intentionally, deliberately, unlawfully and illegally ignored-and-omitted in their professional misconduct endeavors. ; and as explained in precise-and-unequivocal terms in (Kakuta Maimai Hamise v Peris Pesi Tobiko, Independent Electoral and Boundary Commission & Returning Officer Kajiado East Constituency [2017] eKLR)....that "It is desirable that the advocate obtains written authority to act from the client before commencing a suit or representing them in non-contentious business. Under Section 45, Advocates Act, however, parties are free to enter into a remuneration agreement before, after or in the course of any contentious business."
-Otherwise, briefly without needing to repeat the quoted citations in the links above, fee-agreements which should comply with the law of contract { rd. 'Omulele & Tollo Advocates v Magnum Properties Limited [2016] eKLR' where the court categorically stated that "Under no circumstances will the court imply a fee agreement where it does not comply with Section 45(1), Advocates Act. }... thus signify a contracts for service provision between an advocate and a client and is evidence that the advocate was authorized to act by the client , i.e. in such circumstances as mine of continuous-violations-of-the-law evidence-destruction / spoliations series-of-crimes, the court may imply the existence of the authority to act from the conduct of the parties ; not necessarily by proof-of-fees-payments.
-Conduct of the parties additionally includes correspondences between the parties as discerned in { Majanja Luseno & Co Advocates v Leo Investments Ltd and another [2017] eKLR }; and Mwaniki Gachoka & Co. Advocates v Aristide Brilliant Nkuomondo [2019] eKLR that correspondences are capable of giving rise to agreements, provided that there is an offer, acceptance and consideration...facts which can be discerned from a forensic-audit of the phone-transcript correspondences held between Owade & Co Advocates, Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocatestheir employees and Migori Police Station Traffic Dept. / Base Commander / Akidiva Memorial Hospital and/or I. 
-The same evidence can also be corroborated or read directly from the letters-in-correspondences I wrote to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blog-sites as given in the links.
-Secondly, I was as I still am utterly shocked that the the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary deliberately, knowingly, 
discriminatingly decided to disregard the fundamental doctrine of Common Law called the doctrine of precedent, which is captured in the Latin maxim: "Stare decisis et non quieta movere," meaning: "It is best to adhere to decisions and not to disturb questions put at rest."... contrary to the Evidence Act CAP 80 Sec 60(1)(a) on facts on which courts shall take judicial notice' including all written laws, and all laws, rules and principles, written or unwritten, having the force of law, whether in force or having such force as aforesaid before, at or after the commencement of this Act, in any part of Kenya;
-The Kenyan legal system is descended from the British Common Law system. One of the fundamental doctrines of this Common Law is the doctrine of precedent, which is captured in the Latin maxim: "Stare decisis et non quieta movere," meaning: "It is best to adhere to decisions and not to disturb questions put at rest."
-A precedent is a judgment or decision of a court, normally recorded in a law report, used as an authority for reaching the same decision in a subsequent case. Loosely translated, the doctrine of precedent means that cases involving similar circumstances should be decided by the application of similar principles of law. . The application of this doctrine means, generally, that every court is bound to follow the decisions made by the court above it and, on the whole, appellate courts also have to follow their own decisions.
-The Supreme Court is the highest court in Kenya and its decisions are binding on the Court of Appeal, the High Court, the Magistrate's Courts as well as specialized courts and tribunals. The Supreme Court would normally also follow its own decisions unless it can overrule them so that they are set aside and cease to have the force of precedent. The decisions of the Court of Appeal are binding on the High Court and the Magistrates Courts while those of the High Court are binding on the Magistrate's Courts. The decisions of the Magistrate Courts do not in themselves create any binding precedent for any court.
-This doctrine of precedent as properly applied greatly aids in the administration of justice in the following ways:- 
(a.)-It ensures certainty in the law. People are able to order their affairs and come to settlements with a certain amount of confidence when the outcome of litigation can be predicted by referring to previous decisions of the courts.
(b.)-It ensures the impartiality and transparency of judges. Generally, a judge is bound to follow the law enunciated in a previous case unless he or she can overrule or distinguish it.
(c.)- It offers opportunities for the development of the law and the evolution of jurisprudence which cannot be provided by Parliament. The courts can more quickly lay down new principles, or extend old principles, to meet novel circumstances
-I've extensively quoted the 

   (c.):-Establishment of Advocate-Client Relationship
The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary averred inter alia erroneously that:-
-"....It is imperative that you establish an advocate-client relationship while lodging a complaint against 'your' advocate for acts of professional misconduct. In the event legal fees were not paid and/or a written fee agreement is lacking, one is able to establish the same by way of correspondence between yourself as the client and the advocate discussing matters to do with the brief..." ;
-"...You allegedly instructed advocates to render professional legal services on your behalf in exchange for legal fees but you have failed to establish the existence of instructions / advocate-client relationship between yourself and the advocate(s)..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-Without need of repetition, in circumstances such as mine of continuous-violations-of-the-law evidence-destruction / spoliations series-of-crimes conspiracies, the courts, judicial-proceedings or bodies may establish an advocate-client relationship or imply the existence of the authority to act from the conduct of the parties which includes correspondences between the parties ; not necessarily by proof-of-fees-payments; as demonstrated in 13(b2.) above ; for which the same has been thoroughly exhausted as found in the rest of the pleadings cited therein in my prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 submissions submission titled 'On ISSUE No. 2 of availing proof of payment of the legal fees to the advocate(s)' and can be printed-and-downloaded in the provided links herein:- 

   (d.):-Tort of professional Negligence and Liability
The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary averred inter alia erroneously that:-
(d1.)-"...In your submissions, you further indicated that , 'My complaint's grounded in the tort of professional negligence and liability...'noting to cite the decision of the court in 'Blyth vs Birmingham, read together with the breach of duty of care '...since their professional misconducts failed to meet the statutory requirement-thresholds set by law...' We wish to reiterate as herein above that the mandate of the Commission as lying within section 53 of the Advocates Act is to deal with complaints against advocates, law firms or their employees for acts of professional misconduct, not tort..." ;
-Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-I take this solemn opportunity without need of repetition to state that this issue has been exhaustively addressed above in my Introduction where I sought leave to Amend the same to anchor or ground my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 rather on Breach-of-Contract and not Tort pursuant to the provisions of Order 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 as read together with Section 214 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 
-Furthermore I think it'll be prudent to state on behalf of the oppressed and tax-overburdened sovereign public / laity that the fact that the Commission doesn't deal with tort ain't mentioned anywhere neither in Section 53 of the Advocates Act or in the mission statements or forwards of the Advocates Complaints Commission.
-I only came across the fact by mere chance in the Office of the Attorney General's Facebook page last updated around 2020.
-The Advocates Complaints Commission hence was as still is at fault for failing to categorically have the same highlighted either in their mission statements or forwards for purposes of informing the public at large.

(d2.)-"...Further, your allegation has not been backed by any evidence authorizing us to inquire deeper into the complaint, thus lacking 'substance'..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-This is where the intentional, deliberate, misdirections-and-misleadings of the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary comes-in with regards to behind-the-scenes corruption as concerns the world-renown impunity of the Office of the Attorney General of Kenya's specialization to always shield-and-exonerate the corrupt-executive and his economy-cartels cronies from prosecution ; as was demonstrated in the US sanctioning of the former AG Amos Wako, his wife and son.
-This is especially so cause the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's deficient allegation comes in the backdrop of when I'd jus' sent a letter on Thursday, Nov 17th 2022 at 4:10 PM to the Prosecution Counsel Peninnah Ngondi Wawira in the ODPP at penwawira@gmail.comamong others including the ACC-Secretary Leah M Mutua at leah.mutua@ag.go.ke , the  Advocates Complaints Commission at acc@ag.go.kethe Attorney General Justin Muturi at communications@ag.go.ke and civil-society-groups at large ; where the subject-matter ( Subject:-Prosecution Counsel Peninnah Ngondi Wawira in the ODPP Plea To Avail by Office-Messenger or Otherwise The Three Hard-Copy Documentary Evidences To The Advocates Complaints Commission Secretary Senior State Counsel.Leah M Mutua ) addressed squarely your unsubstantiated allegations of... 'evidence authorizing us to inquire deeper into the complaint, thus lacking 'substance'..." ;
-Did the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary liaise with the Prosecution Counsel Peninnah Ngondi Wawira in the ODPP to corroborate-and-verify the same? Nope. I can only read malice in the rush-and-shoddy manner you sped shifting goal-posts to arbitrarily deliver the discriminating, political-legal abuse decision on the following day Friday Nov 18th 2022 at 4:02 PM  "{ Subject: Decision On  ACC COMPLAINT- CC/PE/AUG/22/36 }...Good afternoon, Kindly find attached our response to your complaint lodged with the Advocates Complaints Commission. Yours Faithfully, }..."...devoid of the crucial documentary evidence to shield-and-exonerate the corrupt thief and ICC-Indicted executive Ruto's-AMACO INSURANCE from prosecution. Links of the same are as provided below:-


   (e.):Inconclusive, Defective, Deficient, Prejudiced, Discriminative, Arbitrary, Political-Legal Abuse Conclusion
The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary averred inter alia erroneously that:-
(e1.)-"...It is noteworthy that you have failed, neglected and refused to cooperate with the Commission for the purposes of your complaint as clearly shown in your submissions..." ; 
"...We have (in our communication to you) narrowed down what the Commission would need to pursue your complaint further but you have been insistent on explaining why what we have requested from you is not necessary..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-Without need of repetition, I submit that this is clearly another instance of the misguidings-and-misleadings following-on the deliberate misinterpretation of the matters-and-facts-in-law for purposes of subverting-and-obstructing the rule-of-law o shield the adversely mentioned from prosecution and exonerate them from liabilities...as implicitly-and-explicitly detailed elsewhere in 13(d2) above and that it's indeed rather the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary whocorruptly knowingly-and-intentionally failed, neglected and refused to cooperate   with my prayers to liaise with the Prosecution Counsel Peninnah Ngondi Wawira in the ODPP at penwawira@gmail.com (for whom I've had to amend the prima facie Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 herein to subpoena her to produce the documentary evidences you needed) on the background of the letter I'd sent her on Thursday, Nov 17th 2022 at 4:10 PM entitled Subject:-Prosecution Counsel Peninnah Ngondi Wawira in the ODPP Plea To Avail by Office-Messenger or Otherwise The Three Hard-Copy Documentary Evidences To The Advocates Complaints Commission Secretary Senior State Counsel.Leah M Mutua ) before you rushed to arbitrarily-decide to close the file on the very following day seeing that the water-tight evidence had arrived...
-The Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary failed, neglected and refused to cooperate in disseminating the caselaw / precedent evidence authorities I'd submitted ;

(e2.)-"...The Advocates Complaints Commission is governed not only by the Advocates Act but also the Constitution of Kenya as read together with other laws allowing the Commission to act within the confines of the Law governing it. The Commission is required to accept complaints from the public however, the complaints are scrutinized to ensure that they fall within the limits of the law, thereby giving them 'substance' or 'merit' or lack thereof..." ;
-"...It is also within the mandate of the Commission pursuant to Section 53(4)(a) of the Act to reject a complaint lacking in merit. This complaint as is lacks merit which results from the lack of evidence and is therefore rejected..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-Issue dealt with extensively in 13(b2) above and elsewhere without need for repetition.

(e3.)-"...You are at liberty to appeal the decision of the Commission by exercising your rights as under Section 53(8) of the Advocates Act CAP 16..." ;
"...Take note that we shall proceed to close our file. Yours faithfully, FOR: COMMISSION SECRETARY, ADVOCATES COMPLAINTS COMMISSION.
Leah M. Mutua Senior State Counsel..."
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-I've duly done so as explained in my Introduction where I sought leave to Amend the original Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 and anchor or ground it rather on Breach-of-Contract and not Tort pursuant to the provisions of Order 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 as read together with Section 214 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; for which I then proceeded forth to appeal the same as amended in my Section (D) reading ''The Appeal."

(e4.)-"...Further take note that the Commission is not a court or the Disciplinary Committee. The Commission works with the Disciplinary Committee in prosecuting complaints and thus the court procedure dictates the operations of the Commission while at the Prosecution stage/before the Committee but not at the preliminary stages upon receipt of complaints..." ;
Petitioner-Appellant Argument:
-I submit that the Advocates Complaints Commission is a 'Quasi-judicial' entity as far as its administrative-mandates go which without need of repetition I've demonstrated in my Submissions from Paragraph 26-30  indicating it operates as a department in the Office of the Attorney General and Department of Justice whereby it's tasked with the mandate of enhancing the rule of law and administration of justiceas a regulator of the legal-profession in Kenya and for which it's partly responsible for the realization of the National Vision 2030 by administering justice and professional discipline in the practice of law ;
-According to the 

Wex Definitions Team | LII / Legal Information Institute

 'Quasi-judicial' refers to a proceeding conducted by an administrative or executive official or organization that is 'similar to a court proceeding,' e.g. a hearing conducted by a human rights commission. A court may review a decision arising from a quasi-judicial proceeding. Quasi-judicial can also refer to a judicial act performed by an official who is either not a judge or not acting in his or her capacity as a judge. 
-The same is reflected in the Evidence Act CAP 80 Sec 3 on Interpretation which defines "court" as including all judges and magistrates, and persons, except arbitrators, legally authorized to take evidence; as well as Sec 34 (2)(a) CAP 80 which defines the expression "judicial proceeding" shall be deemed to include any proceeding in which evidence is taken by a person authorized by law to take that evidence on oath; and
-Practically, the same is self-evident in the conduct-and-operations of the Advocates Complaints Commission which so far has basically been replicating the court procedures right from the preliminary stage upon receipt of my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 and the reason why we've gone through the give-and-take submissions stage up to the tele-conversation / direct-examination / deposition stagethe decision / ruling / judgement stage and now the Appeal stage. The Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary are thus evidently misleading-and-misguiding, shoddy-and-shaddy in their interpretation of the dictates of running the Commission.

(D.):- The Appeal

14.-The instant appeal examines the constitutionality of the legal regime governing the Advocates Complaints Commission process that culminated in the Mis-informed, Defective and Prejudiced Decision by the Advocates Complaints Commission dated the Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM and delivered on its behalf by the Secretary sitting in their Headquarters at Cooperative Building , 20th Floor, Nairobi, in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 of I the Petitioner-Appellant Erick Otieno Mango Versus Owade & Co. Advocates and Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) where the Advocates Complaints Commission inadvertently PROCEEDED TO PREMATURELY CLOSE THE FILE Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 discriminatively as per the five-issues cited in their response of the PDF-Letter dated Fri, Nov 18 at 4:02 PM including:-

(a.):-The Mandate of the Advocates Complaints Commission ;

(b.):-Proof of Payment ;

(c.):-Establishment of Advocate-Client Relationship ;

(d.):-Tort of professional Negligence and Liability ;

(e.):-DEFECTIVE CONCLUSION  ;

15.-In which said counterclaim I the Appellant herein seeks against the Respondent-Advocates Complaints Commission prosecution of my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 before the Advocates Disciplinary Committee / Tribunal for Breach-of-Contract with regards to continuous-violations-of-the-law traffic-accident evidence-destruction / spoliation series-of-crimes political-legal abuses involving Owade & Co. Advocates in cahoots with Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) conjunctively with accomplices and co-conspirators including Migori Police Station Traffic Police and Kihara-Construction, plus two ex-Chiefs of Suna East Amara and Odero-and-his-son, plus Peter-and Pamela Mango the dysfunctional, compulsive-neurotic sex-perverts I've disowned pending due process... as detailed in the attached blog-site authorities links memos-letter correspondences to civil-society-groups and concerned authorities ; 

16.-Both unscrupulous Owade & Co. Advocates plus Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates professional misconducts' aggravated, disciplinary-offences' continuous-violations-of-the-law, series-of-crimes Breaches-of-Contract in each both different instances respectively are evident in their failures to meet the strict statutory-and-constitutional advocate-client provision-thresholds prerequisites set by law ( contrary to what lawyers of repute would do ) ; and their consequential acts-and-omissions contrary to the Advocates Act Cap 16 and LSK Act Cap 18 which violated-and-infringed my constitutional-rights and fundamental-freedoms ( as regards the Practice and Procedure Rules for enforcement of the Bill of Rights under Article 22(3) as read with Article 23 and Article 165 (3) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya concerning jurisdictions to enforce rights and fundamental freedoms that have been denied, violated, infringed or threatened ; aka Mutunga Rules intending to provide a framework which facilitates access to justice for all persons seeking to enforce such provisions ) prejudiced my case and gave rise to their liabilities in Breach-of-Contract out of the losses I've incurred  and continue to incur due to their statutory-and-constitutional faults and short-comings which are the effective causes of my injuries, harms and losses ; and for which I file claims for action for damages as well as costs of the suit subject to the Legal Aid Act 2016 which establishes the National Legal Aid Service with the mandate to:-

  1. Provide legal aid services to indigent, marginalized, and vulnerable persons; 
  2. Establish a legal aid scheme to assist the indigent to access legal aid;
  3. undertake and promote research in legal aid, and access to justice with special reference to the need for legal aid services among indigent persons and marginalized groups;
  4.  administer and manage the Legal Aid Fund; and
  5.  perform such other functions as may be assigned to it under this Act or any other written law
  6.  receive grants, gifts, donations or endowments and make legitimate disbursements;
  7.  any other expenditure necessary for the purposes of this Act.
  8.  mitigate the likely occasion of loss of any right or the person who may suffer damages;
  9. mitigate denial of legal aid which would result in substantial injustice to the applicant.
  10. The idea of legal aid is guaranteed by the Constitution through two key provisions: -
           (a.): -Article 48 recognizes the right of access to justice for all, it provides that: "The State shall ensure access to justice for all persons and, if any fee is required, it shall be reasonable and shall not impede access to justice."; while

(b.): -Article 50 gives the right to a fair hearing."

17.-Other provisions of the Constitution relevant to the concept of legal aid include the value of social justice under Article 10; provisions on equality before the law under Article 27; provisions on protection of marginalized and vulnerable persons and the requirement under Article 159 that justice shall be done to all irrespective of status. The overarching notion to be derived from these provisions is that it is difficult to achieve justice where one party has to compete with the elaborate machinery and resources available to the opposite party such as in my GoK imposed indigence where the defendant insurance co AMACO-INSURANCE belongs to the incumbent Ruto, thief and ICC-Indicted character as read together with the 

18.-The Legal Aid Act 2016 establishes the 'National Legal Aid Service' (the Service) as the successor to NALEAP (s5(1) and (2)). The functions of this Service are, inter alia, to - establish and administer a national legal aid scheme that is affordable, accessible, sustainable, credible and accountable (s7(1)(a)); facilitate the representation of persons granted legal aid under the Act (s7(1)(l)); assign legal aid providers to persons granted legal aid under the Act; (s7(1)(m); and administer and manage the Legal Aid Fund (s7(1)(p)). Section 29(1) of the Act establishes the Legal Aid Fund.

-Section 30 of the Act expressly provides inter alia for the 'Application of the Legal Aid Fund': "pay the remuneration of legal aid providers for services provided in accordance with this Act; meet the expenses incurred by legal aid providers in providing services under this Act; and meet the expenses of the operations of the Service as approved by the Board."

-Section 35 of the Act provides the general principles of legal aid that: "The Service shall provide legal aid services at the expense of the State to persons who qualify for legal aid services under this Act; the Service shall provide legal aid services in civil matters; criminal matters; children matters; constitutional matters; matters of public interest; or any other type of case or type of law that the Service may approve. Despite Subsection (2), the Service shall: determine the legal needs of indigent persons and of disadvantaged communities in Kenya; establish priorities for the areas of law, types of proceedings for which it will provide legal aid services; and formulate policies for the kind of legal aid services to be provided in the different areas of law, types of cases and types of proceedings."

-Section 36 of the Act, notes the persons eligible for legal aid and provides that: "A person is eligible to receive legal aid services if that person is indigent, resident in Kenya and is: a citizen of Kenya; a child; a refugee under the Refugees Act (No. 13 of 2006); a victim of human trafficking; or an internally displaced person; or a stateless person. A person who is eligible to receive legal aid services under subsection (1) shall apply to the Service in the prescribed manner. A person shall not receive legal aid services unless the Service has determined that the individual's financial resources are such that the person is eligible for the services. Despite Subsections (1), (2) and (3), the Service shall not provide legal aid services to a person unless the Service is satisfied that: the cost of the proceedings is justifiable in the light of the expected benefits; ... denial of legal aid would result in substantial injustice to the applicant; or there exists any other reasonable ground to justify the grant of legal aid." Part VII of the Act contains provisions on how the application for legal aid should be done.

19.-In addition to the Constitutional and statutory provisions for the Government to provide legal aid, there is an international framework in place committing the Government of Kenya to provide legal aid. The Government has made commitments under various regional and international human rights instruments to enhance access to justice and provide a state funded legal aid scheme. Some of the international human rights instruments include: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1996,The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989, The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons Living with Disabilities, 2007, the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR),

-Provisions of international conventions that Kenya is signatory to are applicable by virtue of Article 2 (6). Therefore provisions of the ICCPR and the commentaries by the Human Rights Committee may provide instances where legal aid is mandatory....They must in other words, be able to "argue their cases …on an equal footing."...substantial injustice is likely to result;

20.-Section 40 of the Act requires that a person who wishes to receive legal aid may apply to the Service in writing so long as such an application is made before the final determination of the matter by a court, tribunal or any other forum to which the application relates.

-In light of the constitutional-and-statutory provisions aforementioned, the provision of legal aid is a constitutional, legal and human right. The appellant is serving a life sentence and in the circumstances of this case, substantial injustice may result unless represented. We therefore find that the applicant, according to Section 41 of the Legal Aid Act is eligible to make the application for legal aid to the Service in person or through any other person authorized by him in writing. The Service may at its discretion grant legal aid to the applicant subject to such terms and conditions, as the Service considers appropriate.


(E.):-The Amended Grounds Of Appeal Are As Follows: - 

21(a.): -THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact when they arbitrarily closed my casefile relying on contradictory and inconsistent interpretation of the law and CoK-2010.

(b.): -THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact when they intentionally outta procedure misdirected themselves to unprecedentedly reject my cogent and plausible documentary evidence on authorities based on the norm of common law practice aka precedent or case law ;

(c.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact when they disregarded-and-failed to consider my authorities authorities based on the norm of common law practise aka precedent or case law evidences ;

(d.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact when they irregularly omitted to accord me an opportunity to testify in a fair hearing occasioning thus a subversion-and-obstruction of the course-of-law, due-process and ultimately a premeditated failure-and-defeat of justice that were curable under PART XII–SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS IRREGULAR PROCEEDINGS of the Criminal Procedure Code and as read with its relevant Sections cited herein including:- 380. Proceedings in wrong place. 381. Repealed. 382. Finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error or omission in charge or other proceedings. 383. Distress not illegal for defect in proceedings. 384. Statements irregularly under section 246.

(e.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact in the glaring procedural errors-and-omissions they occasioned when they should have displayed more diligence in the preliminary stages ;

(f.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact in relying on subsidiary legislation to override the express provisions of Section 77 of the parent statute since it would be an affront to Section 31 (b) of CAP 2 Interpretation and General Provisions Act. ; Judicial bodies have the obligation to interpret the laws in a purposive manner so as to illuminate the spirit of the laws

(g.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact and occasioned the miscarriage-of-justice when they did a shoddy-and-shady job in subverting the course-of-law by not carrying-out any substantial investigations to corroborate my allegations-and-claims, and/or curtailing the same, and/or relying on incomplete-investigations with regards to material inconsistencies ;

(h.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact by breaching-and-violating Article 159 CoK-2010 which posits that justice must be administered without undue regard to procedural technicalities ;

(i.):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact when they knowingly, deliberately and intentionally failed to analyze-or-evaluate the overwhelming evidence-on-record in my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 to corroborate and find out the fact that me the Petitioner-Appellant had indeed established a prima-facie case ;

(j):-THAT the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary erred in both law-and-fact by failing to exercise their discretion well or exhaustively, asa a result of which they reached the perverse, discriminative, biased, political-legal abuse decision  ;


(F.):-Submissions

22.-The Advocates Act, Cap. 16 of the Laws of Kenya is the guiding-statute which expressly provides for the disciplinary processes against Advocates in the country supplemented by the Advocates (Disciplinary Committee) Rules, 1990 vide Legal Notice No. 458 of 1990 and the Advocates (Complaints Commission) (Structure and Procedure) Rules, 2003 under Legal Notice No. 213 of 2003. as well as the CoK-2010 which being the highest law of the land, applies across all State organs, State officers, public officers and all persons whenever any of them applies or interprets the Constitution, enacts, applies or interprets any law or makes or implements public policy decisions.

23.As creatures of the law, the processes governing the disciplinary procedures for Advocates must, therefore, firmly adhere to the Constitution and the law. That is the essence of the rule of law and constitutionalism as espoused in Article 10 of the Constitution. Needless to say, under Article 3, the Constitution obligates every person to respect, uphold and defend the Constitution.

24.-My grievance as the GoK-imposed indigency-pauperism Petitioner-Appellant stems from the contention that the discriminative, political-legal abuse, defective decision was made / issued in violation of mandatory procedure as required under Section 77 as read together with Section 60 of the Advocates Act  and Rule 8 of the Advocates (Disciplinary Committee) Rules thus denying me the opportunity to be heard.

25.-The  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary unprocedurally in violation of the cited Statutes didn't bother to hold any physical-personal hearings, carry-out any requisite investigations to the latter or invoke the Legal Aid Act 2016 to curtail any logistics faced by me, the GoK-imposed indigent, to enforce the law on its due course and dispense justice. The ACC made the faulty, premature decision on the 18th November, 2022 to CLOSE the FILE suspiciously just as the ODPP Prosecution Counsel Penninah Ngondu Waweru was supposed to be liaising to send-or-avail the documentary evidences with signatures, rubber-stamps, dates and all, of the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) ;... evidently for purposes of subverting-and-obstructing the due course of law-and-justice ; and thus the decision was arbitrary, defective, inconclusive, political-legally biased and bad-in-law ;

26.-It's at this point that I inferred the influence of the Executive, ( President William Samoei Ruto who owns the AMACO-INSURANCE Company Ltd at the center of the traffic accident ) ; customarily shielded by the Office of the Attorney General Kenya, from prosecution as was demonstrated by the US's Sanction on former Attorney General Amos Wako, wife and son worse in this case because the current Attorney General Justin Muturi is President William Samoei Ruto's political appointee-and-buddy ;... on the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary especially since he'd had my mobile internet cut-off the day he was swearing-in his Cabinet ; and thus did I concede to what the Migori ODPP had bluntly put regarding the State shielding the Executive and his economy-cartel cronies from prosecution (rd. 'Honor among thieves')

27.-It's my case that the mis-informed and premature decision to arbitrarily close the file was made on account of my broad lawsuit touching on the current President Ruto virtue of his AMACO-INSURANCE Company Ltd and adversely mentioned ex-President Uhuru plus former Premier Raila as detailed;

28.-On the foregoing, I the Petitioner-Appellant claim violations-and-infringements of my right to fair administrative action under Article 47 of the Constitution, the right to fair hearing under Article 50(1) of the Constitution besides the many others as demonstrated elsewhere in this Petition-Appeal Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as Amended ;

29.-It's my appeal that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary engaged in an alien procedure that resulted in an illegality. I posit that it's now incumbent upon the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission to serve the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates (aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates) with the Petition-Appeal Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as amended herein supported by the affidavits deposed to by the ACC-Secretary inviting them to respond to the same ;

30.-Administratively, the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary operate as a department in the Office of the Attorney General and Department of Justice. It comprises the Chairman, Commissioner, Commission Secretary, 24 State Counsel , 23 Para-legal staff  and 2 CID officers who work hand in hand towards the realization of its mandate. It contributes significantly in achieving the goals of the National Vision 2030 by enhancing the rule of law and administration of justice. It remains a key player in the realization of National Vision 2030 by administering justice and professional discipline in the practice of law to realize the Vision's aims of creating "a globally competitive and prosperous country with a high quality of life by 2030". It aims to transform Kenya into "a newly-industrialising, middle income country providing a high quality of life to all its citizens in a clean and secure environment".

31.-Section 2 of Article 47 the Fair Administrative Actions Act defines an 'administrative action' and an 'administrator' as follows: -

'Administrative action' includes -

(i)   The powers, functions and duties exercised by authorities or quasi-judicial tribunals; or

(ii)  Any act, omission or decision of any person, body or authority that affects the legal rights or interests of any person to whom such action relates;

'administrator' means 'a person who takes an administrative action or who makes an administrative decision'

32.-In Civil Appeal 52 of 2014 Judicial Service Commission vs. Mbalu Mutava & Another (2015) eKLR Court of Appeal addressed itself on Article 47 of the Constitution. The Court held that: -

Article 47(1) marks an important and transformative development of administrative justice for, it not only lays a constitutional foundation for control of the powers of state organs and other administrative bodies, but also entrenches the right to fair administrative action in the Bill of Rights. The right to fair administrative action is a reflection of some of the national values in Article 10 such as the rule of law, human dignity, social justice, good governance, transparency and accountability. The administrative actions of public officers, state organs and other administrative bodies are now subjected by Article 47(1) to the Principle of Constitutionality rather than to the doctrine of ultra vires from which administrative law under the common law was developed.

33.-The South African Constitutional Court in President of the Republic of South Africa and Others vs. South African Rugby Football Union and Others CCT16/98) 2000 (1) SA 1 ring-fenced the Importance of Fair Administrative Action as a Constitutional Right. The Court while referring to Section 33 of the South African Constitution which is similar to Article 47 of the Kenyan Constitution stated as follows: 

Although the right to just administrative action was entrenched in our Constitution in recognition of the importance of the common law governing administrative review, it is not correct to see section 33 as a mere codification of common law principles. The right to just administrative action is now entrenched as a constitutional control over the exercise of power. Principles previously established by the common law will be important though not necessarily decisive, in determining not only the scope of section 33, but also its content. The principal function of section 33 is to regulate conduct of the public administration, and, in particular, to ensure that where action taken by the administration affects or threatens individuals, the procedures followed comply with the constitutional standards of administrative justice. These standards will, of course, be informed by the common law principles developed over decades…

34.-Other authorities on the right include Republic v Fazul Mahamed & 3 Others ex-parte Okiya Omtatah Okoiti [2018] eKLR.; and John Wachiuri T/A Githakwa Graceland & Wandumbi Bar & 50 Others vs The County Government of Nyeri & Another...where the Court emphasized that there are three categories of public law wrongs which are commonly used in cases of this nature.

These are: -

a.  Illegality - Decision makers must understand the law that regulates them. If they fail to follow the law properly, their decision, action or failure to act will be "illegal". Thus, an action or decision may be illegal on the basis that the public body has no power to take that action or decision, or has acted beyond its powers.

b. Fairness - Fairness demands that a public body should never act so unfairly that it amounts to abuse of power. This means that if there are express procedures laid down by legislation that it must follow in order to reach a decision, it must follow them and it must not be in breach of the rules of natural justice. The body must act impartially, there must be fair hearing before a decision is reached.

c. Irrationality and proportionality - The Courts must intervene to quash a decision if they consider it to be demonstrably unreasonable as to constitute 'irrationality" or 'perversity' on the part of the decision maker. The benchmark decision on this principle of judicial review was made as long ago as 1948 in the celebrated decision of Lord Green in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd vs Wednesbury Corporation:

35.-The Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's administrative actions-and-omissions were faulty-in-procedure all through and through leading to its resultant arbitrary, impugned decision which was unprecedentedly so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it ;

36.-Speaking to the concept of arbitrariness, the Court of Appeal in Malindi Civil Appeal 56 of 2014 Mtana Lewa v Kahindi Ngala Mwagandi [2015] eKLR made reference to the Black's Law Dictionary 8th Edition that defined arbitrariness in the following manner:- "in it connotes a decision or an action that is based on individual discretion, informed by prejudice or preference, rather than reason or facts."

37.-The High Court in Civil Suit No. 3 of 2006 Kasimu Sharifu Mohamed vs. Timbi Limited [2011] eKLR referred to Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary A. S. Horby Sixth Edition Edited by Sally Wehmeiner which defines the term 'arbitrary in the following way: -"the term arbitrary in the ordinary English language means an action or decision not seeming to be based on a reason, system and sometimes, seeming unfair."

38.-The Supreme Court of China in Sharma Transport vs. Government of A. Palso (2002) 2 SCC 188 had the occasion to interrogate the meaning and import of the term 'arbitrarily'. The Court observed as follows: -"The expression 'arbitrarily' means: in an unreasonable manner, as fixed or done capriciously or at pleasure, without adequate determining principle, not founded in the nature of things, non-rational, not done or acting according to reason or judgment, depending on the will alone."

39.-The term 'arbitrariness' had earlier on been defined by the Court (Supreme Court of China) in Shrilekha Vidyarthi vs. State of U.P (1991) 1 SCC 212 when it comprehensively observed as follows:- "The meaning and true import of arbitrariness is more easily visualized than precisely stated or defined. The question, whether an impugned act is arbitrary or not, is ultimately to be answered on the facts and in the circumstances of a given case. An obvious test to apply is to see whether there is any discernible principle emerging from the impugned act and if so, does it satisfy the test of reasonableness. Where a mode is prescribed for doing an act and there is no impediment in following that procedure, performance of the act otherwise and in a manner which does not disclose any discernible principle which is reasonable, may itself attract the vice of arbitrariness. Every State action must be informed by reason and it follows that an act uninformed by reason, is arbitrary. Rule of law contemplates governance by laws and not by humor, whims or caprices of the men to whom the governance is entrusted for the time being. It is trite that be you ever so high, the laws are above you'. This is what men in power must remember, always."

40.-A careful consideration of my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 yields that the the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary didn't act neither on the law or on the whole evidence before it but only on selective-evidence disregarding the rest. The reasons for its to ARBITRARILY-DECISION to CLOSE my FILE which's faulted for want of reasonableness and sobriety. Thus my claim that Article 47 including my rights under Article 50 of the Constitution which were violated-and-infringed hold irreproachable as per the abundant evidence demonstrated in my  Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as Amended herein and thus the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary acted unfairly-and-impartially on the complaints.

41.-I submit that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary c/o its 2 CID Officers didn't bother to carry-out any  investigations as prayed in my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 to analyze-and-evaluate the forensic-audits of the phone-transcript correspondences held between Owade & Co Advocates, Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocatestheir employees and Migori Police Station Traffic Dept. Base Commander Mr. Aggrey plus Traffic Policeman Mr. Maingi or Akidiva Memorial Hospital and/or I ; or letters-in-correspondences I wrote to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blog-sites as given in the links.

42.-I aver that conduct of the parties additionally includes correspondences between the parties as discerned in { Majanja Luseno & Co Advocates v Leo Investments Ltd and another [2017] eKLR }; and Mwaniki Gachoka & Co. Advocates v Aristide Brilliant Nkuomondo [2019] eKLR that correspondences are capable of giving rise to agreements, provided that there is an offer, acceptance and consideration...facts which can be discerned from a forensic-audit of the phone-transcript correspondences held between Owade & Co Advocates, Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocatestheir employees and Migori Police Station Traffic Dept. / Base Commander / Akidiva Memorial Hospital and/or I. The same evidence can also be corroborated or read directly from the letters-in-correspondences I wrote to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blog-sites as given in the links.

43.-I aver that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary by-and-large grossly violated Article 2(1-6) CoK-2010 on 'any law, including customary law, that are inconsistent with this Constitution being void to the extent of the inconsistency, and any act or omission in contravention of this Constitution is invalid.'

44.-I submit that Article 156 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 provides that "The Attorney-General shall promote, protect and uphold the rule of law and defend the public interest."

45.-I submit that the duty of Appellate Courts or Judicial Bodies therein is to re-analyse and re-evaluate the evidence adduced before them afresh and to arrive at their own independent findings. See Okeno vs. Republic [1972] EA 32 where the Court of Appeal set out the duties of a first appellate court as follows:

"An Appellant on a first appeal is entitled to expect the evidence as a whole to be submitted to a fresh and exhaustive examination (Pandya vs. Republic (1957) EA. (336) and the appellate court's own decision on the evidence. The first appellate court must itself weigh conflicting evidence and draw its own conclusion. (Shantilal M. Ruwala vs. R. (1957) EA. 570).  It is not the function of a first appellate court merely to scrutinize the evidence to see if there was some evidence to support the lower court's finding and conclusion; it must make its own findings and draw its own conclusions. Only then can it decide whether the magistrate's findings should be supported. In doing so, it should make allowance for the fact that the trial court has had the advantage of hearing and seeing the witnesses, see Peters vs. Sunday Post [1958] E.A 424."

-Similarly in Kiilu & Another vs. Republic [2005]1 KLR 174, the Court of Appeal stated thus:

1. An Appellant on a first appeal is entitled to expect the evidence as a whole to be submitted to a fresh and exhaustive examination and to the appellate Court's own decision on the evidence.  The first appellate Court must itself weigh conflicting evidence and draw its own conclusions.

2. It is not the function of a first appellate Court merely to scrutinize the evidence to see if there was some evidence to support the lower Court's findings and conclusions; Only then can it decide whether the Magistrate's findings should be supported.  In doing so, it should make allowance for the fact that the trial Court has had the advantage of hearing and seeing the witnesses.

(G.):-Prayers, Orders, Restitutions, Remedies, Reliefs and/or Legal-Redresses Sought:-

(1.):-A declaration be made that the proceedings-of-the-Arbitrary-DECISION-to-CLOSE-my-File by The Advocates Complaints Commission c/o The Secretary sitting at Cooperative Building, 20th Floor, Nairobi, delivered-and-issued on Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36  was illegal, null and void ab initio as they violated-and-infringed Article 47 on fair administrative action of the Constitution as read together with Article 50(1) on the right to fair hearing;

(2.):-A declaration be made that the proceedings entertained by the learned Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary in my Advocates Complaints Commission  Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 were illegal, null and void ab initio as it lacked both substantive-and-procedural basis under Section 60 of the Advocates Act as read together with Section 60A of the Advocates Act and Rule ;

(3.):-A declaration be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary by proceeding as they did on the Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 breached the law and violated-and-infringed my fundamental-rights and freedoms of me the indigent Petitioner-Appellant by denying me the right to a Fair-Hearing as contemplated under Section 60A of the Advocates Act as read together with Article 47 on administrative-dysfunctions or impunity in the context of administrative-action; plus as read together with Article 50(1) on the provision of every persons' rights to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of the law decided in a fair and public hearing before a court or an independent and impartial tribunal or body ; as well as read together with Article 50(4) CoK-2010 provision on evidence obtained in a manners violating any rights-or-fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights to be excluded if the admission of such evidence would render the trial unfair, or would otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice.

(4.):-A declaration be made that the ORDER-DECISION of the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary to CLOSE-my-File as was made, delivered-and-issued on Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Advocates Complaints Commission Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36  of Erick Otieno Mango v. Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) was illegal, null and void and of no effect ;

(5.):-An order be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's DECISION to CLOSE-my-File as was made, delivered-and-issued on Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Advocates Complaints Commission Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 of Erick Otieno Mango v. Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) be DISCHARGED and SET ASIDE and that the Petition-Appeal Complaint as amended be restored ;

(6.):-An order be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's bear the costs of this Appeal proceedings and/or that such costs be subjected to the Legal Aid Act 2016 which establishes the National Legal Aid Service ; while those costs in the subordinate Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary be borne by the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) and/or as well be subjected to the Legal Aid Act 2016 which establishes the National Legal Aid Service ... wherever instance each applies respectively ; 

(7.):-That the Appellate-Advocates Complaints Commission Re-analyze and Re-evaluate the evidence-in-record afresh and arrive at their own independent findings... in light of the Appeal-Submissions before them as Amended Identify the Issues, Matters and Facts-of-Law for determination and after taking into consideration Principles-of-Law that guide Judicial-Processes / Courts in the determination of those issues and applying the thresholds therein to the rival positions before them, pronounce themselves on those issues. -In that instance I rely on the authorities cited in my submissions above below including:- (a.):-Okeno vs. Republic [1972] EA 32 and 

                                                                                                                         (b.):- Kiilu & Another vs. Republic [2005]1 KLR 174

                                                                                                                 
(8.):-That the Petition-Appeal Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as amended herein be served upon the unscrupulous defendants 
Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) ;
(9.):-A declaration be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary were strictly liable for contempt-of-court in my Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 case because of their acts-and-omissions  which interfered with the course of justice in relation to the Advocates Complaints Commission's judicial-proceedings mandates ; contrary to and violating-and-infringing the Contempt of Court Act No 46 of 2016 ; which for purposes of subsection (3), it shall be immaterial whether the interference was not intentional ;
(10.):-That the Appeal in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 as amended herein be allowed ;
(11):-A declaration be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary by proceeding as they did on the Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 breached-and-violated the 
Public Officer Ethics Act, 2003 (POEA), the Leadership and Integrity Act (LIA), 2011, Chapter Six and Article 73 of the Constitution of Kenya-2010 as read together with Articles 47 on administrative-dysfunctions or impunity in the context of  administrative-action in Article 59(1) (h)(i)(k); for which I seek judicial redress pursuant to Article 3 CoK-2010 ;
(12.):-That pursuant to Rule 25 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules 2013 The application herein be certified as urgent and service thereof be dispensed with in the first instance.
(13.):-That pursuant to Section 2,3,4(1)(2)(3)(5),5(1) of CAP 78 on 'Witness Summons (Reciprocal Enforcement)' as read together with Sections 64,65(1)(5),69,70 of the Evidence Act CAP 80 ; and as read together with Sections 53(3)(3A),4(d),6,6(A),6(B) and 77 of the Advocates Act CAP 16 on the Advocates Complaints Commission requiring persons to assist it on its duties and Sections 47(1)(2)(3)(a)(b) Article 47 on Fair Administrative Action the Appellate-Advocates Complaints Commission subpoena Penninah Ngondi Wawira, Prosecution Counsel in the ODPP  and thus compel her to produce the documentary evidences detailing the signatures, rubber-stamps, dates and all, of the unscrupulous defendants Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates );
(14.):-A declaration be made that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary  failed to consider the issue of admissibility, credibility and relevance of the documents-in-question prayed-for above courtesy of Penninah Ngondi Wawira, 
Prosecution Counsel in the ODPP as provided under Section 35(4) of the Evidence Act and thus urge the the Appellate-Advocates Complaints Commission to to allow the appeal as prayed ;
(15.):-A declaration be made that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's lame-excuse decision to knowingly, deliberately, intentionally and erroneously conduct a tele-conversation / hearing / direct-examination lasting five-to-ten minutes as was made on Monday, November 14, 2022instead of full proper-hearing pursuant to Section 60A of the Advocates Act was impromptu, discriminatory, contemptuous, misleading, misguiding, defective, incompetent, misplaced, bad in law and unreliable since I was even abruptly cut-off by my phone-battery dying ; and was thererfore effectively illegal, null and void ;
(17.):-A declaration be made that the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary proceeding as they did on 
Monday, November 14, 2022in conducting a tele-conversation / hearing / direct-examination lasting five-to-ten minutes
disregarded and didn't observe all the Principles of Natural Justice in dealing with me, the seriously aggrieved GoK-imposed indigence Petitioner-Appellant by knowingly, deliberately, intentionally, subverting-and-obstructing to facilitate a full proper hearing pursuant to Section 60A of the Advocates Act at the Commission offices at Cooperative Building, 20th Floor, Nairobi, as earlier envisaged in their letter on Monday, October 31, 2022 at 03:30:53 PM GMT+3 
(18.):-A declaration be made that the  Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary's faulty-claim of admitting ONLY Documentary Evidence is Unfounded in-Law for having deliberately failed to consider my case-law / precedent authorities evidence on oral contracts ; and that it was therefore corrupt, shoddy-and-shady, misleading-and-misguiding much as  improper, null and void ;
(19.):--A declaration be made that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary by proceeding as they did on the Friday 18th November, 2022 At 4:02 PM in Complaint No.-CC/PE/AUG/22/36 didn't accord me a GoK-imposed indigent any administrative-or-procedural fairness in reaching the Impugned Decision, as demonstrated by the evidence that the Respondent Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary didn't fully comply with the constitutional-and-legal procedural requirements defining the Hearing-of-Complaints whereby they flouted the procedural aspect of the process, never kept within its confines or allowed me any reasonable time for hearing. 'Twas a faulty procedure all through and through whereby its resultant arbitrary, impugned decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it ;
(20):-A declaration be made that the 2 CID officers constituting the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary didn't carry-out any investigations as required and as I'd prayed to discern the matters-and-facts in law in-and-of the Conducts-and-correspondences between the parties with regards to forensic-audits of the phone-transcript correspondences held between Owade & Co Advocates, Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocatestheir employees and Migori Police Station Traffic Dept. / Base Commander / Akidiva Memorial Hospital and/or I as elaborated in { Majanja Luseno & Co Advocates v Leo Investments Ltd and another [2017] eKLR }; and Mwaniki Gachoka & Co. Advocates v Aristide Brilliant Nkuomondo [2019] eKLR that correspondences are capable of giving rise to agreements, provided that there is an offer, acceptance and consideration..; nor did they corroborated or read directly from the letters-in-correspondences I wrote to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blog-sites as given in the above links.
(21.):-An order be made that the 2 CID officers constituting the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary carry-out the statutory-and-constitutionally mandated requisite investigations that they'd initially maliciously disregarded-and-discarded as relates to forensic-audits of the phone-transcript correspondences held between:- 
(a.): -Owade & Co Advocates of phone no.s: +254-5920231 and/or 0733615017; his employees of phone no.s: 
(b.): -Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates of phone no.s: 0722433266;
(c.): -Migori Police Station Traffic Dept. / Base Commander Mr. Aggrey of phone no.s: 0722441650and 
(d.): -Traffic policeman Mr. Maingi of phone no.s: 
(e.): -Akidiva Memorial Hospital of phone no.s: +254 776 388361 +254 722 255732 +254 722 228427; and/or 
(f.): -I, Erick Otieno Mango the Appellant-Petitioner of phone no.s:  0723047863 and/or 0764087863 
...as well as corroborate and read directly from the letters-in-correspondences records I wrote to civil-society-groups and recorded in my blogsites as given in the provided links including:
 
(22):-An order be made that the unscrupulous lawyers Owade & Co. Advocates and  Mudeyi Okumu & Company Advocates ( aka Kerario Marwa & Co. Advocates ) render me full and unqualified apologies including statements in the widest possible newspaper-circulations plus unconditional admissions of liabilities for breaches-of-contracts in each respective instance ;
(23.): -Pre-and post-judgement interests;
(24.): -An order be made for injunctions barring the Advocates Complaints Commission and its Secretary from any further violations, discrimination or infringements of my constitutional rights and fundamental-freedoms.
(25.): -An order be made pursuant to Article 23(3as read with Article 156(6) that I be granted appropriate relief to preserve my endangered fundamental-rights and-freedoms ; where 'appropriate relief' is defined as "a relief that is required to protect and enforce the Constitution "… a declaration of rights, an interdict, mandamus, or such other relief as may be required to ensure that the rights enshrined in the Constitution are protected and enforced"  as declared in the authorities of EWA and 2 others v. Director of Immigration and Registration of Persons & another (2018) eKLR and Fose v. Minister of Safety and Security (CCT 14/96) 1997, ZACC 6, 1997.
(26.):-In this my Petitioner-Appellant's Application I therefore seek inter alia an order to the effect that this Appellate 
Advocates-Complaints Commission declares that a person shall be strictly liable for contempt of court in any case where the person does any act which interferes or tends to interfere with the course of justice in relation to any judicial proceedings. For purposes of subsection (3), it shall be immaterial whether the interference was not intentional.
(27.):-A declaration be made that I'm entitled to compensation by way of damages for violations of my constitutional-and-fundamental rights;

Links